|
Youngs Cup
Quarters
Rebecca Colthup reports ...
Dear Squashsite readers,
With
Fram away in Melbourne the job of covering the Youngs Wimbledon Cup in her
absence has fallen to me! I have to say that journalism isn’t really my thing
but I will give it a go!
This morning saw the quarter final matches, I was refereeing on one court and
Malc Whitley the other, so I can only really report on the matches I marked. |
[3/4] Rebecca Macree bt Harriet
Ingham
9/2, 9/0, 9/1 (12m) |

I feel that I played well considering I haven’t played any tournaments for 13
months. I was hitting the ball and moving around the court well. I am looking
forward to tonight’s match against Laura, I want to see how I handle the
pressure of a tough match… it’s been a while!
Rebecca Macree

I feel that I played
well, its very good experience to get on court with Rebecca. The match has
shown me the areas of the game that I need to work on with my coach Stephen
Meads.
Harriet Ingham
Fantastic …. Harriet played very well, she has improved a lot this season and
I think that is down to her playing for our club's ladies team.
Mrs Ingham

I was disappointed not
to win the 3rd, I had my chances but didn’t take them. I feel that I am
playing well at the moment, I have been trying to get a good balance between
the long and short game and not giving away cheap points by going short to
soon. On the whole I have had a good tournament, I had a good result last
night so I can’t complain.
Phil Rushworth
[1] Pam Nimmo bt
Leonie Holt
9/3, 9/1, 9/1 (16m) |
[1] Joey Barrington bt
Tom Richards
11/8, 11/5, 11/6 (38m) |

[2] Stacey Ross bt
Tim Vail
4/11, 11/9, 11/6, 11/6 (41m) |
|
[3/4] Carla Khan bt Rachel
Willmott
9/2, 9/0, 9/2 (19m) |
The first
match on court was Carla Khan and Rachel Wilmott. The match
started at an amazing pace with both payers keen to stamp their authority on
the match.
Rachel started the better of the two and crept into the lead with some
precision lengths and drops but Carla wasn’t ready to let Rachel dictate the
pace and soon got into her stride. She had Rachel doing all the running and
sure enough the pressure told and a few errors started creeping into to
Rachel’s game. 3-0 to Carla.
"I
am pleased with how I played, it was quite a comfortable win in the end.
I have been out for 6 months through illness so it’s really good to get
back paying in competitive matches.
"Rachel has lots of potential and will be someone to watch out for in
the future."
Carla Khan |
|
[2] Laura Lengthorn bt Claire
Kidd
9/1, 9/2, 9/2 (19m) |
Next on Court was Laura
Lengthorn, last year's runner up, hoping for one better this year and
Claire Kidd.
This match was completely different to the first, both players played some
precision lengths and wonderful touch shots. Laura was the stronger player and
after a close early exchange her strength and variety told. 3-0 to Laura.
"I
think I played well but Laura is a lovely player.
It was a very tough match, she had me moving all round the court and the
pressure told and I got tired in the third and couldn’t retrieve her
boasts.
Claire Kidd |
|
[3/4] Peter Genever bt Phil
Rushworth
12/10, 4/11, 14/12, 11/4 (41m)
|
The next
match I marked was Phil Rushworth, our club pro and Peter Genever.
Phil is a very tenacious player and battled throughout the first game to build
up a lead but Peter hung in there and despite being 10-8 down he played two
great rallies to pull it back to 10-10, tiebreaker. Phil didn’t play the tie
breaker very well and made two errors to hand the game to Peter. All that
effort and then he sticks it in the tin!! The second game was a total
contrast, Phil attacked played the ball early, moved his opponent around the
court and won the rallies with a series of unretrievable drop shots. 1-1.
The third game was where the match was won. Phil carried on where he left off
and raced into a 9-4 lead but Peter wasn’t to be easily beaten and dug deep
forcing Phil into several errors. 10 – 10 The tiebreaker was fiercely
contested with Peter complaining that Phil wasn’t clearing the ball but to be
honest it was 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. Peter was the stronger
player in the tiebreak and won it 14-12. The fourth was one sided with Peter
in full control winning it 11-4.
"I
was quite lucky to win the game, Phil played really well.
"I didn’t feel relaxed at all through out the game.
"In the third I knew that I just needed to hang in there and I would
win, which I did so I’m pleased."
Peter Genever |
|
[3/4] Scott Handley bt Steve
Coppinger
11/9, 4/11, 11/6, 11/4 (37m) |
The last quarterfinal I refereed
was between Scott Handley and Steve (seriously tall!!)
Coppinger.
The first game was a close affair with both players trying to get the upper
hand, a couple of errors at a crucial point gave the game to Scott 11/9. Steve
then stepped up his game, started taking the ball early and dominating the mid
court. 11/4 to Steve 1-1.
I think Scott had enough of doing all the running in the 2nd that he slowed
the pace down in the 3rd, played straighter and tighter, not giving his
opponent the chance to take the ball early.
Now it was Steve doing all the running. 11-6 to Scott. The fourth continued in
the same vain with Scott dictating the pace of the game and with Steve running
out of energy the errors crept in and Scott ran out the winner 11/4.
"Steve is very strong around the T and
I let him get in front of me and take the ball early in the first two
games.
"In the third I changed my game and slowed things down a bit and stopped
going short too early in the rally. I started playing the ball
straighter to stop Steve dominating and it worked."
Scott Handley |
|
|
I have to
give a mention to Harriet Ingham who at 13 was our youngest competitor
by far! Harriet played Claire Baker, tournament organiser in the first round
and won, what a result!! Harriet played really well and Claire found that
Harriet was not a player to be under estimated! One to watch for the future I
think.
Anyway, I have got to go and referee the Semi finals but I will keep you up to
date with everything that has been going on here at Wimbledon.
Rebecca Colthup |